Megestrol and tamoxifen in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E4882).

To investigate the effect of adding tamoxifen to megestrol in the hormonal therapy for advanced endometrial cancer, 66 patients were entered in this study. Initially, 41 patients were randomized to either the standard progestin therapy of megestrol or to the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen between October 1982 and October 1984. The megestrol arm was terminated because of poor accrual and 25 patients were directly assigned to the combination arm. Among the 20 eligible cases on the megestrol arm, the response rate of 20% consisted of I complete response and 3 partial responses. The response rate on the megestrol plus tamoxifen arm was 19% with 1 (2%) complete response and 7 (17%) partial responses among 42 eligible cases. The median survival times were 12.0 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Only mild and moderate toxicities were observed on megestrol compared with more toxic complications observed on the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen, including a life-threatening case of pulmonary embolism. Although we could not carry out a comparative evaluation as intended, we conclude that the combination of megestrol and tamoxifen offers no clinical advantage over megestrol alone in the treatment of advanced endometrial carcinoma.

Phase II trial of cisplatin, etoposide, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (PB586).

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease despite significant progress in chemotherapy. We conducted a phase II clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin, etoposide, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination in advanced metastatic and/or recurrent NSCLC. Forty patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic, measurable NSCLC were treated with cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on day 1; etoposide, 120 mg/m2/day i.v. on days 1, 2, and 3; and 5-FU. 1,000 mg/m2/day i.v. continuous infusion on days 1 through 5. Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles. Thirty patients had distant metastases and were previously untreated, and 10 patients had recurrent disease after prior treatment with either surgery (1 patient), radiation therapy (5 patients), or both treatments (4 patients). Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Seven (24%) patients achieved a partial remission (PR), 18 (62%) had stable disease (SD), and 8 (14%) had progressive disease (PD). Overall median survival was 7.9 months (range, 0.4-27.4 months). Patients who achieved a PR had a median survival of 23.5 months (9.3-27.4 months). In contrast, patients with SD had a median survival of 9.9 months (2.5-25.3 months), and patients with PD had a median survival of 2.1 months (1-9.3 months). Median duration of response of 27.1 weeks (4.9-76.5 weeks) for patients with PR, and time to progression was 13.4 weeks (3.7-54.5 weeks) for patients with SD. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and gastrointestinal, and there were three deaths due to infection. The combination of cisplatin, 5-FU, and etoposide as administered in this study appears to have considerable toxicity and does not appear to be superior to other cisplatin-containing regimens used for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

21-day oral etoposide for metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study and review of the literature.

Previous studies of etoposide for metastatic breast cancer commonly used bolus regimens given over a short period of time and included heavily pretreated patients. Results were poor. Chronic oral regimens would be expected to be superior to bolus doses based on pharmacologic studies and patients with less previous chemotherapy would be expected to have higher response rates. We studied the efficacy of oral etoposide at a dose of 50 mg/m2/day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle in good-risk patients with metastatic breast cancer. Healthy patients (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, 1, or 2) who had not received chemotherapy for at least 1 year before study entry were selected for therapy. Thirty-four patients were entered; three patients were ineligible and one was cancelled. Thirty patients were available for analysis of response. One complete response and eight partial responses were documented (response rate, 30%; 95% confidence interval, 15-49%). A higher response rate was observed in those patients who never received chemotherapy compared with those who had received prior chemotherapy (57 vs. 6%, p = 0.004). There were two treatment-related deaths, both owing to myelosuppression and infection. We found long-term administration of oral etoposide to have a reasonable response rate for metastatic breast cancer (30%). Our response rate was comparable to those of other published studies of long-term oral etoposide regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Response rates in single-arm studies have generally been higher for long-term oral regimens than those for bolus regimens. We also found the regimen to be significantly toxic, an observation that may be underemphasized in the earlier literature.

Prognostic value of histologic grade and proliferative activity in axillary node-positive breast cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Companion Study, EST 4189.

PURPOSE: The identification of a subset of patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer with an improved prognosis would be clinically useful. We report the prognostic importance of histologic grading and proliferative activity in a cohort of patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer and compare these parameters with other established prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group laboratory companion study (E4189) centered on 560 axillary lymph node-positive patients registered onto one of six eligible clinical protocols. Flow cytometric (ploidy and S-phase fraction [SPF]) and histopathologic analyses (Nottingham Combined Histologic Grade and mitotic index) were performed on paraffin-embedded tissue from 368 patients. RESULTS: Disease recurred in 208 patients; in 161 (77%), within the first 5 years. Mitotic index and grade were associated with both ploidy and SPF (P

Oral clonidine in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer experiencing tamoxifen-induced hot flashes: a University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program study.

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes are the most frequently reported side effect of tamoxifen treatment. Although hormones are an effective treatment, their safety is questionable in women with breast cancer. It is therefore important to evaluate nonhormonal treatments for hot flashes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of oral clonidine for control of hot flashes associated with tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. SETTING: University of Rochester Cancer Center Community Clinical Oncology Program. PATIENTS: 194 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. INTERVENTION: Oral clonidine hydrochloride, 0.1 mg/d, or placebo for 8 weeks. MEASUREMENTS: In a daily diary, patients recorded number, duration, and severity of hot flashes and overall quality-of-life score (on a 10-point scale) during a 1-week baseline period and during the 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks of the study. RESULTS: Patients in the placebo and treatment groups were similar in age, duration of tamoxifen use, reported frequency and duration of hot flashes at baseline, and dropout rates. One hundred forty-nine patients completed 12 weeks of follow-up. The mean decrease in hot flash frequency was greater in the clonidine group than in the placebo group after 4 weeks of treatment (37% compared with 20% [95% CI for difference, 7% to 27%]) and 8 weeks of treatment (38% compared with 24% [CI for difference, 3% to 27%]). Patients receiving clonidine were more likely than patients receiving placebo to report difficulty sleeping (41% compared with 21%; P = 0.02). A significant difference was seen in the mean change in quality-of-life scores (0.3 points in the clonidine group compared with -0.2 points in the placebo group; P = 0.02) at 8 weeks, although the median difference was 0 in both groups. CONCLUSION: Oral clonidine, 0.1 mg/d, is effective against tamoxifen-induced hot flashes in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Phase II study of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in previously treated metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study (PA 185).

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) combination in previously treated advanced breast cancer. METHODS: Thirty-six women with recurrent metastatic breast cancer were entered on a phase II study of 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day given intravenously as a continuous infusion on days 1-3 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day given intravenously over 1 h on days 2-4, repeated every 21 days. All subjects had received one previous chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease and either progressed during treatment or relapsed after responding to previous chemotherapy. Fourteen patients had also received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 17 patients had previous radiation therapy, and 29 patients had previous hormonal therapy. RESULTS: Among 32 response-evaluable patients, there were 10 partial remissions (31%) and 1 complete remission (3%), with an overall objective response rate of 34%. Median duration of response was 4 months. Median survival was 10.5 months for responders and 9.5 months for the entire group. Toxicity was mild to moderate in most patients. Overall twelve patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (10 hematologic, 1 mucositis, and 2 nausea). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Infusional cisplatin and 5-FU is a well tolerated and active regimen in women with previously treated advanced breast cancer.

Active specific immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma: phase I study of an allogeneic cell vaccine plus low-dose interleukin-1 alpha.

A vaccine consisting of four allogeneic colon carcinoma cell lines (DLD-1, HCT116, WiDr, and T84) mixed with the adjuvant DETOX (Mycobacterium phlei cell wall and Salmonella minnesota lipid A) was administered to 25 patients with low-volume metastatic colorectal carcinoma. The first eight patients received vaccine only, given intradermally on three occasions at 3-week intervals. Subsequent patients also received subcutaneous interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), 0.3-0.5 microgram/m2 per day for 8 days after each vaccination in an outpatient setting. Vaccine alone caused local erythema, induration, and pruritus. IL-1 caused fevers, chills, and rigors that started in 4 h and lasted 1-2 h. One patient developed a brief loss of consciousness with a rigor that resolved without sequelae. One episode of mild hypotension occurred. Fatigue occurred by day 8 of IL-1. A substantial increase in the number of patients with positive skin tests to DLD-1 and HCT116 occurred after vaccine treatment both without and with IL-1 alpha. An allogeneic cell vaccine plus subcutaneous IL-1 was administered safely to outpatients with some evidence of in vivo effect observed.

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials of observation versus maintenance therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer in complete remission following induction treatment.

PURPOSE: To investigate the value of maintenance treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer whose disease is in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-five women (141 eligible) whose disease was in CR or in CR except for bone metastases following six cycles (6 months) of doxorubicin-containing induction treatment were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, tamoxifen, and halotestin [CMF(P)TH] or observation. In a previous pilot study, patients in CR after 24 months of induction treatment were randomized to continue chemotherapy for 4 more years or stop chemotherapy. RESULTS: Among patients randomized to CMF(P)TH, life-threatening toxicity included leukopenia in 3%, thrombocytopenia in 3%, cardiac in 2%, and diabetes in 1%. The median time to relapse from randomization was 18.7 months on CMF(P)TH and only 7.8 months on observation (P < .0001). The median time to death was 32.2 months on CMF(P)TH and 28.7 months on observation (P=.74). Similar results were seen in the pilot study (median time to relapse, 12.6 and 6.4 months; median survival, 37.7 and 24.2 months; study too small for statistical significance). Maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in time-to-relapse models. CONCLUSION: There is definite toxicity associated with CMF(P)TH maintenance treatment. When CR was obtained on induction, maintenance treatment with CMF(P)TH was never significant in survival models. However, maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in the time-to-relapse models, which motivates its consideration for appropriately informed patients.

Induction chemotherapy of dibromodulcitol, Adriamycin, vincristine, tamoxifen, and Halotestin with methotrexate in metastatic breast cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study (E1181).

Patients who have metastatic breast cancer are seldom curable. Chemotherapy given by conventional doses and schedules generally produces complete remissions in 10% to 20% of patients. This study sought to determine 1) whether a combination of dibromodulcitol, Adriamycin, vincristine, tamoxifen, Halotestin, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (DAVTHML) can produce a complete remission rate of 50%; and 2) the toxicity of this combination in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer. Patients were treated with six 28-day cycles of DAVTHML induction chemotherapy consisting of dibromodulcitol, 135 mg/m2 perorally days 1 to 10; Adriamycin 45 mg/m2 intravenously day 1; vincristine, 2 mg intravenously day 1; tamoxifen and Halotestin, 20 mg perorally daily; methotrexate, 800 mg/m2 intravenously days 15 and 22; and leucovorin, 15 mg/m2 perorally every 6 hours for 9 doses, starting 4 hours after methotrexate. After induction, patients who had stable disease or a partial response were treated with a cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil-based regimen (CMF). Patients in complete remission were treated with three additional cycles of DAVTHML after achieving complete remission and then observed off therapy until relapse, when DAVTHML was to be given again. Fifty-eight patients were included in this study. During induction, 26% of eligible patients experienced a complete remission; overall response rate was 80%. The median time to treatment failure and the median survival time of eligible patients was 11.1 and 24.0 months, respectively. This did not change significantly when all the patients were included in the evaluation. The 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 37% and 11%, respectively. Ninety percent of the eligible patients experienced grade III or IV toxicity. They were leukopenia (75%), anemia (20%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and vomiting (17%). No lethal toxicity was documented during therapy; however, 1 patient later died of myelodysplastic syndrome induced by dibromodulcitol. The overall response and complete remission rates from our study were encouraging. The toxicity of DAVTHML was tolerable, with the exception of myelodysplastic syndrome from dibromodulcitol. The concept of using mid-cycle nonmyelosuppressant agents to increase complete remission rate is feasible.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of operable locally advanced breast carcinoma: results of a randomized trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to test the role of radiotherapy following total mastectomy, axillary dissection, and adjuvant systemic therapy in the management of operable locally advanced breast carcinoma. METHODS: After undergoing mastectomy and axillary dissection, 426 patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma were registered on study and stratified by patient characteristics and risk factors. All patients were then treated with six courses of chemohormonotherapy. After being restaged, the 332 patients remaining without recurrence were randomized to receive prophylactic radiotherapy or to undergo observation and receive radiotherapy only if and when there was locoregional recurrence. RESULTS: Three hundred twelve of 332 randomized patients were deemed eligible and analyzed for both time to relapse and survival. The median follow-up period was 9.1 years. There were no significant differences in time to relapse and overall survival between the two treatment arms. Of those assigned to radiation, 60% relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 4.7 years, and 46% were alive at last follow-up, with a median survival of 8.3 years. Of those assigned to observation, 56% relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 5.2 years, and 47% were alive at last follow-up, with a median survival of 8.1 years. The two treatment arms had significantly different patterns of sites of first recurrence. There were 9% fewer locoregional first recurrences among those assigned to radiation than among those assigned to observation (15% vs. 24%), whereas there were 15% more first relapses at distant sites (50% vs. 35%) among those assigned to radiation (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma, following mastectomy, axillary dissection, and adjuvant systemic therapy, results in fewer locoregional but more distant recurrences at first relapse. No significant advantage was seen for consolidation radiotherapy over observation in terms of either time to relapse or survival, both of which were virtually identical in the two treatment arms. [See editorial counterpoint on pages 1061-6 and reply to counterpoint on pages 1067-8, this issue.]

Pain and treatment of pain in minority patients with cancer. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Minority Outpatient Pain Study.

BACKGROUND: Clinics that primarily see members of ethnic minority groups have been found to provide inadequate treatment of cancer-related pain. The extent of undertreatment of pain in these patients and the factors that contribute to undertreatment are not known. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the severity of cancer-related pain and the adequacy of prescribed analgesics in minority outpatients with cancer. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. PATIENTS: 281 minority outpatients with recurrent or metastatic cancer. MEASUREMENTS: Patients and physicians independently rated severity of pain, pain-related functional impairment, and pain relief obtained by taking analgesic drugs. Analgesic adequacy was determined on the basis of accepted guidelines. RESULTS: 77% of patients reported disease-related pain or took analgesics; 41% of patients reporting pain had severe pain. Sixty-five percent of minority patients did not receive guideline-recommended analgesic prescriptions compared with 50% of non-minority patients (P < 0.001). Hispanic patients in particular reported less pain relief and had less adequate analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: The awareness that minority patients do not receive adequate pain control and that better assessment of pain is needed may improve control of cancer-related pain in this patient population.

Phase II trial of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination in advanced measurable gastric cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

A phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of the etoposide, doxorubicin, cisplatin (EAP) regimen in the treatment of patients with advanced measurable gastric cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative group setting. Thirty-one evaluable patients with advanced measurable gastric adenocarcinoma were treated with etoposide 120 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, and 5, doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9. The treatment was repeated every 28 days. Objective responses were seen in 7 (23%) patients, all achieving partial remissions. Median survival was 9 months for the entire group. Toxicity was mostly hematologic, with grade 3 leukopenia in 26% and grade 4 leukopenia in 55% of the patients. There were 4 treatment-related deaths that were attributable to severe leukopenia and sepsis. Because of the high toxicity and moderate response rate, this regimen is not superior to other less toxic regimens and cannot be recommended for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer outside of an investigational protocol.

Fundamental dilemmas of the randomized clinical trial process: results of a survey of the 1,737 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group investigators.

PURPOSE: We studied oncologists' attitudes and behavior with regard to their participation in randomized clinical trials. METHODS: We surveyed the 1,737 physician members of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) using the Physician Orientation Profile (POP), a self-administered mailed questionnaire. A response rate of 86% was achieved (1,485 of 1,737); each physician's actual patient accrual was recorded. RESULTS: All respondents indicated that they had a systematic pattern of patient preselection for entry onto trials beyond the formal inclusion/exclusion trial criteria. Eighty-nine percent stated that improving patient quality of life rather than prolonging survival was more personally satisfying. Sixty-two percent did not enter a single patient during the 12-month period following the survey, while 10% entered 80% of all patients during that time. Physicians overestimated their accrual rate by a factor of 6. Eighty-three percent defined randomization and adherence to trial protocol as a serious challenge to their ability to make individualized treatment decisions. CONCLUSION: This study raises questions regarding the following: (1) the perceived generalizability of trial findings, (2) the role of end points other than survival for clinical trials, (3) the consequences of physician overestimation of patient accrual, and (4) the impact of randomized trials on the behavior of clinicians. Further investigation into these critical issues will provide meaningful recommendations to enhance the future design, implementation, and conduct of randomized clinical trials in cancer.

Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Pain is often inadequately treated in patients with cancer. A total of 1308 outpatients with metastatic cancer from 54 treatment locations affiliated with the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group rated the severity of their pain during the preceding week, as well as the degree of pain-related functional impairment and the degree of relief provided by analgesic drugs. Their physicians attributed the pain to various factors, described its treatment, and estimated the impact of pain on the patients' ability to function. We assessed the adequacy of prescribed analgesic drugs using guidelines developed by the World Health Organization, studied the factors that influenced whether analgesia was adequate, and determined the effects of inadequate analgesia on the patients' perception of pain relief and functional status. RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of the patients (871 of 1308) reported that they had had pain or had taken analgesic drugs daily during the week preceding the study, and 36 percent (475 of 1308) had pain severe enough to impair their ability to function. Forty-two percent of those with pain (250 of the 597 patients for whom we had complete information) were not given adequate analgesic therapy. Patients seen at centers that treated predominantly minorities were three times more likely than those treated elsewhere to have inadequate pain management. A discrepancy between patient and physician in judging the severity of the patient's pain was predictive of inadequate pain management (odds ratio, 2.3). Other factors that predicted inadequate pain management included pain that physicians did not attribute to cancer (odds ratio, 1.9), better performance status (odds ratio, 1.8), age of 70 years or older (odds ratio, 2.4), and female sex (odds ratio, 1.5). Patients with less adequate analgesia reported less pain relief and greater pain-related impairment of function. CONCLUSIONS: Despite published guidelines for pain management, many patients with cancer have considerable pain and receive inadequate analgesia.

Phase II study of goserelin for patients with postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate of postmenopausal breast cancer patients to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, Zoladex (goserelin; ICI Pharma, Wilmington, DE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional single-agent trial in postmenopausal patients was conducted. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol were requested before and after Zoladex treatment. RESULTS: For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients, the response rate was 11%, with one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PRs) among 36 eligible patients. Responses were of short duration. There were no responses among 16 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients. CONCLUSION: GN-RH agonists have activity in ER+ postmenopausal patients, but response rates are not as high as with other available endocrine therapies and the duration of response is short.

Physician attitudes and practice in cancer pain management. A survey from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVE: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a groupwide survey to determine the amount of knowledge about cancer pain and its treatment among physicians practicing in ECOG-affiliated institutions and to determine the methods of pain control being used by these physicians. DESIGN: Survey. SETTING: A questionnaire was sent to all ECOG physicians with patient care responsibilities (medical oncologists, hematologists, surgeons, and radiation therapists), practicing in university institutions, Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) institutions, and Cooperative Group Outreach Programs (CGOP) institutions. MEASUREMENTS: A physician cancer pain questionnaire developed by the Pain Research Group at the University of Wisconsin was used. The questionnaire was designed to assess physicians' estimates of the magnitude of pain as a specific problem for cancer patients, their perceptions of the adequacy of cancer pain management, and their report of how they manage pain in their own practice setting. RESULTS: The study analyzed responses to 897 of 1800 surveys. In regard to the use of analgesics for cancer pain in the United States, 86% felt that the majority of patients with pain were undermedicated. Only 51% believed pain control in their own practice setting was good or very good; 31% would wait until the patient's prognosis was 6 months or less before they would start maximal analgesia. Adjuvants and prophylactic side-effect management should have been used more frequently in the treatment plan. Concerns about side-effect management and tolerance were reported as limiting analgesic prescribing. Poor pain assessment was rated by 76% of physicians as the single most important barrier to adequate pain management. Other barriers included patient reluctance to report pain and patient reluctance to take analgesics (both by 62%) as well as physician reluctance to prescribe opioids (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Professional education needs to focus on the proper assessment of pain, focus on the management of side effects, and focus on the use of adjuvant medications. A better understanding of the pharmacology of opioid analgesics is also needed. Physicians also need to educate patients to report pain and to effectively use the medications that are prescribed for pain management.

Phase II study of lonidamine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study.

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group conducted a phase II study of lonidamine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The drug was given orally to a maximum daily dose of 340 mg/m2. Forty-two patients were entered on study. One partial response was observed; there were no life-threatening toxicities. The results of this study are compared to two similar phase II trials.

Continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of refractory breast cancer.

Ten patients with metastatic breast cancer refractory to multiple chemotherapeutic regimens as well as hormonal therapy were treated with continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at 200-300 mg/m2/24 h through a Broviac catheter using a Cormed pump. The treatment was continued until toxicity developed and restarted after resolution of the toxicity. Most common dose-limiting toxicities were mucositis and diarrhea. No grade II or worse myelosuppression was documented. All the patients had received 5-FU by bolus injection before entering the study. We observed three partial responses and one improvement, with two patients continued on the study (396+ and 90+ days, respectively). We conclude that continuous infusion of 5-FU is safe and tolerable even by heavily pretreated patients with poor performance status and is not cross-resistant to bolus injection of 5-FU and other chemotherapeutic agents. Our report warrants further investigation.

A study of aminoglutethemide and hydrocortisone in patients with advanced and refractory prostate carcinoma.

We have studied aminoglutethemide (AG) combined with hydrocortisone in 28 patients with advanced and refractory prostate carcinoma. All the patients had failed at least one endocrine therapy. Six patients received only one prior hormonal treatment. Five patients were off study within 3 weeks due to early death and toxicity, 14 had progressive disease, and 9 had stable disease. No objective partial remission was observed, but the nine stable patients had therapeutic benefit, with improvement in bone pain and performance status for a median duration of 153 days. Three patients withdrew because of postural hypotension, dizziness, weakness, and lethargy. The median survival of the entire group was 186 days (range 41-606 days). Our results suggest that aminoglutethemide and hydrocortisone can be an alternative treatment for patients with advanced and refractory prostate carcinoma.